Another mistake: I spread my money across too many traders and ended up learning nothing. At the beginning I thought diversification meant copying everyone who looked good, so I followed six or seven traders at once. The result was a messy equity curve and no idea which strategy was actually working or failing.
What I wish I knew is that, for learning, one main trader plus maybe one small “test” account is more than enough. It’s much easier to understand how a single strategy behaves – how it reacts to news, trending markets, and ranging conditions – when your account isn’t a mix of random styles. Over-diversifying with random traders can accidentally increase risk instead of reducing it. If you’re new, don’t turn your account into a trader zoo.
Start focused, then expand later once you actually understand what you’re following.
What I wish I knew is that, for learning, one main trader plus maybe one small “test” account is more than enough. It’s much easier to understand how a single strategy behaves – how it reacts to news, trending markets, and ranging conditions – when your account isn’t a mix of random styles. Over-diversifying with random traders can accidentally increase risk instead of reducing it. If you’re new, don’t turn your account into a trader zoo.
Start focused, then expand later once you actually understand what you’re following.
風險提示：本文所述僅代表作者個人觀點，不代表 Followme 的官方立場。Followme 不對內容的準確性、完整性或可靠性作出任何保證，對於基於該內容所採取的任何行為，不承擔任何責任，除非另有書面明確說明。
喜歡的話，讚賞支持一下
暫無留言。 來發表第一則觀點吧。